JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 4, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo

✓Claimant Sin Información·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Incidente De Impacto Fiscal
  • Competencia de la Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia de declaratoria de desierto
Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Contra La Expresion Procurador Judicial Contenida En El Articulo 182 Del Decreto 262 De 2000
  • Declarar desierto incidente de impacto fiscal de sentencia C-101/13 por no sustentación
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se declara DESIERTO el incidente de impacto fiscal presentado por la Procuradora General de la Nación € contra el segundo resuelve de la sentencia C-101/13, en virtud del vencimiento del término de treinta días concedido para sustentar el incidente, sin que se recibiera documento alguno.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Declarar DESIERTO el incidente de impacto fiscal, presentado por la Procuradora General de la Nación (E), mediante escrito del 20 de junio de 2013, contra el
  2. segundo. resuelve de la Sentencia C- 101 de 2013, de esta Corporación, por las razones expuestas en este proveído.
  3. Notifíquese, publíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.